Re: Caught up

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Caught up
Date: 2012-09-22 17:58:04
Message-ID: CAA-aLv7+bqnQaeBtJSE+npeNXY8BgUnx47dK03TGU-fgtj74Vg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3 September 2012 15:20, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> I spent the month of August going through 1.7k emails I had saved from
> the previous year that required my attention. I want to thank everyone
> for helping me close many open items, and for tolerating my questions.
>
> Ideally I would have dealt with many of these emails earlier, but time
> constraints caused the delay. On a bright note, August seems to be an
> ideal time to catch up, and I plan on doing a similar cleaning next
> August, hopefully with less backlog.
>
> On a related note, I apologize that many of these items didn't make it
> into 9.2, though they are committed for 9.3. The good news is that most
> of my work was in documentation improvements and clarifications, that
> could be backpatched to 9.2. I did not bring this up earlier because I
> didn't want to distract the work of making the improvements.
>
> If anyone wants to look at backpatching some of these doc changes into
> 9.2, I will not object. ;-) I am attaching a partial list of doc
> changes that might be considered. (I need to improve my commit messages
> that reference earlier commits by including the old commit tag; my
> apologies.) No one has mentioned backpatching so perhaps these are all
> too minor, which is fine.
>
> Again, many thanks. I feel much better without the weight of
> uncompleted items over my head.

That's a huge number of amendments. Thanks for giving these some
attention Bruce.
--
Thom

In response to

  • Caught up at 2012-09-03 14:20:07 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jay Levitt 2012-09-22 18:02:28 Pushing restrictions down into GROUP BYs?
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2012-09-22 17:57:54 Re: Draft release notes complete