| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Pg Committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Do missed autoheader run for previous commit. |
| Date: | 2011-11-18 14:24:35 |
| Message-ID: | 1321626148-sup-2656@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie nov 18 11:12:32 -0300 2011:
>
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie nov 18 00:39:42 -0300 2011:
> >> Do missed autoheader run for previous commit.
>
> > Hmm, does the win32 file need updating too?
>
> I don't see HAVE_SCANDIR in there, do you?
Well, I wonder if the win32 file needs to be hooked to the whole
autoconf/autoheader thing somehow. I mean, if HAVE_SCANDIR wasn't
there, does this mean that when it was added to pg_config.h we forgot to
update the win32 copy?
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-18 14:54:23 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Do missed autoheader run for previous commit. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-18 14:12:32 | Re: pgsql: Do missed autoheader run for previous commit. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-18 14:35:05 | Re: Core Extensions relocation |
| Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2011-11-18 14:12:38 | Re: RangeVarGetRelid() |