Re: pgsql: Do missed autoheader run for previous commit.

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Do missed autoheader run for previous commit.
Date: 2011-11-21 20:08:33
Message-ID: 201111212008.pALK8Xw14292@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie nov 18 11:12:32 -0300 2011:
> >
> > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie nov 18 00:39:42 -0300 2011:
> > >> Do missed autoheader run for previous commit.
> >
> > > Hmm, does the win32 file need updating too?
> >
> > I don't see HAVE_SCANDIR in there, do you?
>
> Well, I wonder if the win32 file needs to be hooked to the whole
> autoconf/autoheader thing somehow. I mean, if HAVE_SCANDIR wasn't
> there, does this mean that when it was added to pg_config.h we forgot to
> update the win32 copy?

Well, Win32 doesn't have HAVE_SCANDIR, so it didn't need to be defined, I
think.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-11-21 21:20:13 pgsql: More code review for rangetypes patch.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-11-21 16:25:33 pgsql: Fix citext upgrade script to update derived copies of pg_type.ty

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2011-11-21 20:26:55 Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-11-21 20:07:49 Re: Core Extensions relocation