| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: cfbot mistakenly reports that a rebase is needed |
| Date: | 2025-08-14 14:14:17 |
| Message-ID: | 131776.1755180857@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com> writes:
> Occasionally CI may fail not because something is wrong with my patch.
> In such cases the "CI status" column shows me a red icon and something
> like "9/10". A few extra clicks are needed for every patch to
> understand what happened. When using cfbot I see right away that
> something went wrong on Windows for almost all the patches, as an
> example.
Yeah, I agree with this: the "9/10" presentation is a bit too
compact, as it doesn't allow seeing patterns in the failures.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2025-08-14 14:16:49 | Re: [PATCH] bms_prev_member() can read beyond the end of the array of allocated words |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2025-08-14 14:11:33 | Re: Compilation issues for HASH_STATISTICS and HASH_DEBUG options |