From: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)tigerdata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: cfbot mistakenly reports that a rebase is needed |
Date: | 2025-08-14 13:29:09 |
Message-ID: | CAJ7c6TMx9PvSTbsgNjmRoYcJ+DU5TyCJz50ygDEBTVwqOSaR=g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
> > Isn't the cfbot.cputube.org web page obsolete now that we have the CI
> > status directly in the commitfest page?
>
> Well, yeah, it's kind of duplicative --- but it slices the data
> differently and it presents it differently. The more modern
> pages don't have an easily-bookmarked summary of the state of
> your own patches. (The "dashboard" page is cluttered with a ton
> of other stuff, or at least it is for me.) So I still use the
> cputube.org pages often, and I guess Aleksander does too.
cfbot is more convenient in my typical use cases.
Let's say I want to check if any of my patches needs a rebase. I just open:
https://cfbot.cputube.org/aleksander-alekseev.html
... and instantly get the answer. I can achieve the same with CF app,
however the URL is going to be different every month, e.g:
Occasionally CI may fail not because something is wrong with my patch.
In such cases the "CI status" column shows me a red icon and something
like "9/10". A few extra clicks are needed for every patch to
understand what happened. When using cfbot I see right away that
something went wrong on Windows for almost all the patches, as an
example.
I could leave without cfbot but this would make my workflow less convenient.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2025-08-14 13:30:26 | Re: cfbot mistakenly reports that a rebase is needed |
Previous Message | Greg Burd | 2025-08-14 13:20:45 | [PATCH] bms_prev_member() can read beyond the end of the array of allocated words |