| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only |
| Date: | 2011-08-26 20:03:41 |
| Message-ID: | 1314388924-sup-9817@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie ago 26 15:36:36 -0300 2011:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> > I don't have anything in principle against your '--sections="foo bar"'
> > suggestion, but it would be more work to program. Simpler, and probably more
> > consistent with how we do other things, would be allowing multiple --section
> > options, if we don't want to have named options such as I have provided.
>
> I wouldn't object to that, but "more work to program" probably means
> about an extra 10 lines of code in this particular case.
The "--section=data --section=indexes" proposal seems very reasonable to
me -- more so than "--sections='data indexes'".
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2011-08-26 20:32:40 | Re: Inputting relative datetimes |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-08-26 18:36:36 | Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only |