Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only
Date: 2011-08-26 21:11:08
Message-ID: 5560.1314393068@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> The "--section=data --section=indexes" proposal seems very reasonable to
> me -- more so than "--sections='data indexes'".

+1 ... not only easier to code and less squishily defined, but more like
the existing precedent for other pg_dump switches, such as --table.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-08-26 22:23:13 Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-08-26 21:02:35 Re: tsvector concatenation - backend crash