Re: What happened to pl/proxy and FDW?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Ing(dot) Marcos Ortiz Valmaseda" <mlortiz(at)uci(dot)cu>
Cc: Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What happened to pl/proxy and FDW?
Date: 2009-12-09 14:07:52
Message-ID: 1260367672.8753.12.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On ons, 2009-12-09 at 08:56 -0500, Ing. Marcos Ortiz Valmaseda wrote:
> Which is the development state of SQL/MED?

That depends on what features of SQL/MED you are interested in. As you
could read upthread, PL/Proxy support is being worked on. Dblink
supports it in 8.4. The next step might be foreign table support. I
recall that there was a patch proposed for that a couple of commitfests
ago, but that did not go further.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2009-12-09 14:18:58 Re: [patch] pg_ctl init extension
Previous Message Zdenek Kotala 2009-12-09 14:04:29 Re: [PATCH] dtrace probes for memory manager