Re: [patch] pg_ctl init extension

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [patch] pg_ctl init extension
Date: 2009-12-09 14:18:58
Message-ID: 1260368338.1422.39.camel@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas píše v st 09. 12. 2009 v 08:56 -0500:
> On Dec 9, 2009, at 8:32 AM, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> wrote:

<snip>
> >
> > Ahh, It is somethink what I want to do, but it is not ready yet in
> > this
> > patch, but I already documented it. Idea is to install initdb and
> > postgres into libexecdir and packager can select if libexecdir will be
> > equal bindir or not.
> >
> > The paragraph should be removed at this moment. Shell I send modified
> > patch or does committer remove it before commit?
>
> I think Peter claimed this one but as far as I am concerned, I would
> always rather have an updated patch.

OK, here it is.

Thanks Zdenek

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_init_doc_03.patch text/x-patch 11.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-12-09 14:28:47 Re: [ADMIN] recovery is stuck when children are not processing SIGQUIT from previous crash
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-12-09 14:07:52 Re: What happened to pl/proxy and FDW?