| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Vejsada <pve(at)paymorrow(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade (12->14) fails on aggregate |
| Date: | 2022-06-17 14:14:13 |
| Message-ID: | 1216673.1655475253@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:01 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
>> To me, oid>=16384 seems more hard-wired than namespace!='pg_catalog'.
> Extensions can be installed into pg_catalog, but they can't get
> low-numbered OIDs.
Exactly. (To be clear, I had in mind writing something involving
FirstNormalObjectId, not that you should put literal "16384" in the
code.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Derek Zasiewski | 2022-06-17 17:03:28 | Issue with SSL and password protected keys in DER/PK8 format |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2022-06-17 13:30:15 | Re: pg_upgrade (12->14) fails on aggregate |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-06-17 14:33:08 | Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2022-06-17 13:30:15 | Re: pg_upgrade (12->14) fails on aggregate |