| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Vejsada <pve(at)paymorrow(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade (12->14) fails on aggregate |
| Date: | 2022-06-17 13:30:15 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRBLR7rJAo5Ki9uw=XJnefJU7jRaAYSAaQYLPfK2rDQC6A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
pá 17. 6. 2022 v 15:07 odesílatel Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
napsal:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:01 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > > Also, I'd be inclined to reject system-provided objects by checking
> > > for OID >= 16384 rather than hard-wiring assumptions about things
> > > being in pg_catalog or not.
> >
> > To me, oid>=16384 seems more hard-wired than namespace!='pg_catalog'.
>
> Extensions can be installed into pg_catalog, but they can't get
> low-numbered OIDs.
>
yes
Unfortunately, I did it in Orafce
Regards
Pavel
> --
> Robert Haas
> EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-06-17 14:14:13 | Re: pg_upgrade (12->14) fails on aggregate |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-06-17 13:07:21 | Re: pg_upgrade (12->14) fails on aggregate |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-06-17 14:14:13 | Re: pg_upgrade (12->14) fails on aggregate |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-06-17 13:07:21 | Re: pg_upgrade (12->14) fails on aggregate |