| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance |
| Date: | 2016-12-23 16:59:18 |
| Message-ID: | 11996.1482512358@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Great, committed. I realize just now that I forgot to credit anyone
> as a reviewer, but hopefully nobody's going to mind that too much
> considering this is a purely mechanical patch I wrote in 20 minutes.
Do you have any particular objection to taking the next step of removing
enum InhOption in favor of making inhOpt a bool? It seems to me that
stuff like
- bool recurse = interpretInhOption(rv->inhOpt);
+ bool recurse = (rv->inhOpt == INH_YES);
just begs the question of why it's not simply
bool recurse = rv->inh;
Certainly a reader who did not know the history would be confused at
the useless-looking complexity.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-12-23 17:25:44 | Re: Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance |
| Previous Message | Anastasia Lubennikova | 2016-12-23 16:39:02 | Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem |