Re: Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance
Date: 2016-12-23 12:37:09
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZSaYaNdee9KH3CTzeOgTZ2gPXzEeRAgwLc9_Ez114Dfg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:25 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I agree. Patch attached, just removing the GUC and a fairly minimal
>> amount of the supporting infrastructure.
>
> +1 to removing the sql_inheritance GUC. The patch looks good to me.

Great, committed. I realize just now that I forgot to credit anyone
as a reviewer, but hopefully nobody's going to mind that too much
considering this is a purely mechanical patch I wrote in 20 minutes.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2016-12-23 12:48:39 Re: Logical decoding on standby
Previous Message tushar 2016-12-23 12:29:50 Server Crash while running sqlsmith [TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(keylen < 64)", File: "hashfunc.c", Line: 139) ]