Re: Many persistant client connections

From: lst_hoe01(at)kwsoft(dot)de
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Many persistant client connections
Date: 2005-03-31 08:52:16
Message-ID: 1112259136.424bba40cf286@webmail.kwsoft.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Zitat von Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>:

> lst_hoe01(at)kwsoft(dot)de writes:
> > i would like to know if there is something like the Oracle "shared
> > server" possible with PostgreSQL. I have searched the archives but
> > have not found any real discussion regarding this.
> >
> > We have two CTI applications opening 2-3 persistant connections to
> > the address server (PostgreSQL). With 100 clients we get around 400
> > persistant connections eating up the server memory and have nothing
> > to work most of the time.
>
> Sounds like a case for looking into pgpool...
>
> <http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgpool/>
>
> pgpool is a connection pool system implemented in C that can allow
> sharing of connections for many cases like the one you describe.

Thanks for the info. Is this the recommended way to handle many persistant
client connections or are there other opinions/possibilities?

Regards

Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cris Carampa 2005-03-31 09:33:28 Re: standalone version of psql.exe?
Previous Message Cris Carampa 2005-03-31 08:48:47 standalone version of psql.exe?