Re: Many persistant client connections

From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Many persistant client connections
Date: 2005-03-30 15:36:33
Message-ID: 60oed1rvr2.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

lst_hoe01(at)kwsoft(dot)de writes:
> i would like to know if there is something like the Oracle "shared
> server" possible with PostgreSQL. I have searched the archives but
> have not found any real discussion regarding this.
>
> We have two CTI applications opening 2-3 persistant connections to
> the address server (PostgreSQL). With 100 clients we get around 400
> persistant connections eating up the server memory and have nothing
> to work most of the time.

Sounds like a case for looking into pgpool...

<http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgpool/>

pgpool is a connection pool system implemented in C that can allow
sharing of connections for many cases like the one you describe.
--
(format nil "~S(at)~S" "cbbrowne" "cbbrowne.com")
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/postgresql.html
"The present need for security products far exceeds the number of
individuals capable of designing secure systems. Consequently,
industry has resorted to employing folks and purchasing "solutions"
from vendors that shouldn't be let near a project involving securing a
system." -- Lucky Green

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John DeSoi 2005-03-30 16:14:38 Re: problems with user rights
Previous Message Zouari Fourat 2005-03-30 15:17:54 Re: problems with user rights