From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CVS should die (was: Possible make_oidjoins_check |
Date: | 2004-11-04 22:20:17 |
Message-ID: | 1099606817.10449.18.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
[CC list trimmed]
On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 06:41, Tom Lane wrote:
> (I'm rather interested to know whether any other SCMs have a better
> solution to this problem, and if so what it is. It's not obvious how
> to do better.)
Sure -- just about every "next generation" OSS version control tool gets
this right, or at least does a lot better than CVS -- i.e. svn,
monotone, arch, darchs, and possibly others I haven't heard of.
Gavin and I have been using Monotone for a few weeks now to manage some
development we're doing. I've been really impressed with it --
conceptually, it just "makes sense". Unfortunately the implementation is
currently too immature to consider moving the main development tree
onto, at least for the moment.
-Neil
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-11-04 22:24:43 | Re: Edit query buffer |
Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2004-11-04 22:11:33 | Re: pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-11-04 22:24:43 | Re: Edit query buffer |
Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2004-11-04 21:29:41 | Re: CVS should die |