Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
Date: 2004-03-12 15:56:40
Message-ID: 1079107000.27332.6.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 10:14, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Andreas Pflug [ mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de
> <mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> ]
>
> Sent: 12 March 2004 13:57
>
> To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com <mailto:josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
>
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org <mailto:pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
>
> Isn't gforge a pgsql related project itself?
>
> So I'd suggest:
>
>
>
> www.postgresql.org <http://www.postgresql.org> -> main PostgreSQL
> site
>
> gforge.postgresql.org -> gforge interface site
>
> <projectname>.postgresql.org -> gforge hosted projects
>
>
>
>
>
> The problem with that approach is that our 'official' sites then get
>
> lost amongst the project sites.
>
>
>
> We need some distinction between the core project sites and other
>
> project sites - istm that a different domain is the only way to do that.
>
> (breaking previous rule) I agree.
>
> Also, the gforge people would prefer us *not* to use a name that
> includes gforge, because of the risk of confusion. That's how we came up
> with "pgfoundry" in the first place.
>

maybe pgsqlfoundry is a better compromise?

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hervé Piedvache 2004-03-12 16:17:21 vacuum log are difficult to read ...
Previous Message Jeroen T. Vermeulen 2004-03-12 15:50:54 Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Swan 2004-03-12 16:43:34 Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs.
Previous Message Jeroen T. Vermeulen 2004-03-12 15:50:54 Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org