| From: | "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |
| Date: | 2004-03-12 15:50:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20040312155054.GV39391@xs4all.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:37:58AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Well, if you want to think along those lines, I believe that we (PGDG)
> currently hold these domain names:
[...]
This is the one I was silently rooting for, but figured was too good to
be true.
> You could make a case that postgres.org for the projects would be the
> perfect complement to postgresql.org for the core.
Still _slightly_ confusing, but I think the plain and simple idea of a
prominent banner was mentioned. We can have them both ways to avoid all
confusion. I say go for it!
Jeroen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2004-03-12 15:56:40 | Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2004-03-12 15:49:35 | Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2004-03-12 15:56:40 | Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2004-03-12 15:49:35 | Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. |