Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
Date: 2004-03-12 16:56:53
Message-ID: 200403120856.53073.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Robert,

> maybe pgsqlfoundry is a better compromise?

No, too long. People'd end up calling it pgFoundry anyway.

Besides, Gavin Roy already designed us a nice "pgFoundry" logo. ;-)

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2004-03-12 17:20:00 Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-03-12 16:54:53 Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs.

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2004-03-12 17:20:00 Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-03-12 16:54:53 Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs.