Re: FSM, now without WAL-logging

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FSM, now without WAL-logging
Date: 2008-09-24 20:14:33
Message-ID: 10712.1222287273@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>> What's about truncate FSM during WAL replay of main fork truncation record?

> That would work, except that there's no WAL record for truncating the
> main fork.

Whaddya mean there's no WAL record for that? smgrtruncate produces one.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2008-09-24 20:27:37 Re: Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches (for CommitFest:Sep)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-09-24 19:46:54 Re: Interval literal rounding bug(?) and patch.