Re: New PostgreSQL Books

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Sarah Schnurr <xenophenes42(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New PostgreSQL Books
Date: 2018-03-16 20:06:36
Message-ID: 10498ECF-7201-4A85-9E81-DB5D6D914D0C@postgresql.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


> On Mar 16, 2018, at 4:05 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 16 Mar 2018, at 20:03, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org <mailto:jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Sarah,
>>
>>> On Mar 16, 2018, at 3:42 PM, Sarah Schnurr <xenophenes42(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:xenophenes42(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello all!
>>>
>>> I'm one of the developers working on the new PostgreSQL website, and while reviewing for outdated information I noticed there's some new books published in 2017 & 2018 that aren't in the Books database. Are there any arguments against including these?
>>> https://bookauthority.org/books/new-postgresql-books <https://bookauthority.org/books/new-postgresql-books>
>>> https://bigmachine.io/products/a-curious-moon <https://bigmachine.io/products/a-curious-moon>
>> From my time helping to add content typically we’ve added books when people
>> have asked us to do so. From someone who predates me: are we ok with
>> adding references to books when the author has not specifically reached out?
>
> There are potential copyright images with pictures of them if we do that. I doubt anyone would complain, but you never know.

In that case, we could do the old-fashioned “one of us reach out” and see if they
are okay with listing it.

Jonathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sarah Schnurr 2018-03-16 20:08:14 Re: New PostgreSQL Books
Previous Message Dave Page 2018-03-16 20:05:17 Re: New PostgreSQL Books