From: | Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: New PostgreSQL Books |
Date: | 2018-03-16 23:11:35 |
Message-ID: | 2750ef6d-2c59-8442-4377-0d4dc696e7a6@darrenduncan.net |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 2018-03-16 1:06 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>> On Mar 16, 2018, at 4:05 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> On 16 Mar 2018, at 20:03, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>>
>>>> On Mar 16, 2018, at 3:42 PM, Sarah Schnurr wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm one of the developers working on the new PostgreSQL website, and while
>>>> reviewing for outdated information I noticed there's some new books
>>>> published in 2017 & 2018 that aren't in the Books database. Are there any
>>>> arguments against including these?
>>>>
>>>> * https://bookauthority.org/books/new-postgresql-books
>>>> * https://bigmachine.io/products/a-curious-moon
>>> From my time helping to add content typically we’ve added books when people
>>> have asked us to do so. From someone who predates me: are we ok with
>>> adding references to books when the author has not specifically reached out?
>>
>> There are potential copyright images with pictures of them if we do that. I
>> doubt anyone would complain, but you never know.
>
> In that case, we could do the old-fashioned “one of us reach out” and see if they
> are okay with listing it.
Exactly, just what I was going to say. If they don't come to us, but we become
aware they exist, we ask them. -- Darren Duncan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Clift | 2018-03-17 00:45:43 | Re: New PostgreSQL Books |
Previous Message | charleshuett | 2018-03-16 21:14:45 | RE: New PostgreSQL Books |