Re: New PostgreSQL Books

From: Sarah Schnurr <xenophenes42(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New PostgreSQL Books
Date: 2018-03-16 20:08:14
Message-ID: CA+m7vT6agqwpKfd0fwzRzWg9dxkZnoseHrjR5wVPbqYwgOb90A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

I'd be more than happy to do that, if that's an agreeable solution.

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
wrote:

>
> On Mar 16, 2018, at 4:05 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 16 Mar 2018, at 20:03, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Hi Sarah,
>
> On Mar 16, 2018, at 3:42 PM, Sarah Schnurr <xenophenes42(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hello all!
>
> I'm one of the developers working on the new PostgreSQL website, and while
> reviewing for outdated information I noticed there's some new books
> published in 2017 & 2018 that aren't in the Books database. Are there any
> arguments against including these?
>
> - https://bookauthority.org/books/new-postgresql-books
> - https://bigmachine.io/products/a-curious-moon
>
> From my time helping to add content typically we’ve added books when people
> have asked us to do so. From someone who predates me: are we ok with
> adding references to books when the author has not specifically reached
> out?
>
>
> There are potential copyright images with pictures of them if we do that.
> I doubt anyone would complain, but you never know.
>
>
> In that case, we could do the old-fashioned “one of us reach out” and see
> if they
> are okay with listing it.
>
> Jonathan
>
>

--
Sarah Schnurr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message charleshuett 2018-03-16 21:14:45 RE: New PostgreSQL Books
Previous Message Jonathan S. Katz 2018-03-16 20:06:36 Re: New PostgreSQL Books