| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: repository size differences |
| Date: | 2010-09-21 22:10:22 |
| Message-ID: | 10466.1285107022@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Magnus did
>> git gc --aggressive --prune
>> during the conversion. I imagine it's the --aggressive that does it.
> It's also possible that some of the history cleanup we did might have
> helped, although that's pure speculation on my part.
The converted repositories I was getting during testing (without any use
of git gc) were circa 300MB. So it wasn't the CVS-side cleanups that
did it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-21 22:16:23 | Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-21 22:05:40 | Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there? |