| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: repository size differences |
| Date: | 2010-09-21 22:02:18 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=aNq_eEqtMAhnZb7=XwZGxsGruBPmBm5zAnSK2@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org> writes:
>> My new clone of git://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git is 196MB,
>> whereas my old clone (last synced around the beginning of September)
>> was 285MB.
>
>> Does anyone know offhand why the sizes are so different?
>
> Magnus did
> git gc --aggressive --prune
> during the conversion. I imagine it's the --aggressive that does it.
It's also possible that some of the history cleanup we did might have
helped, although that's pure speculation on my part.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-09-21 22:04:42 | Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-21 21:53:22 | Re: repository size differences |