From: | Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net> |
---|---|
To: | Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha(at)lklug(dot)pdn(dot)ac(dot)lk> |
Cc: | Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases |
Date: | 2002-10-11 13:30:55 |
Message-ID: | 1034343056.4863.53.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
I'd be curious to hear in a little more detail what constitutes "not
good" for postgres on a mosix cluster.
Greg
On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 06:15, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 04:29:53PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> >
> > Well, I don't think adding support for multiple slaves to usogres would be that
> > problematic. Of course if you want to load balance your application queries,
> > application has to be aware of that. I will not do sending requests to a mosix
> > cluster anyway.
>
> Have already tested postgres on a mosix cluster, and as expected results
> are not good. (although mosix does the correct thing in keeping all the
> database backend processes on one node).
>
> Anuradha
>
> --
>
> Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.18-xfs-1.1)
>
> Remember: Silly is a state of Mind, Stupid is a way of Life.
> -- Dave Butler
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-10-11 13:36:52 | Re: MySQL vs PostgreSQL. |
Previous Message | Antti Haapala | 2002-10-11 13:20:22 | MySQL vs PostgreSQL. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2002-10-11 13:40:26 | Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2002-10-11 12:05:58 | Re: Catalogs Doc update |