| From: | Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha(at)lklug(dot)pdn(dot)ac(dot)lk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Copeland <greg(at)copelandconsulting(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases |
| Date: | 2002-10-14 05:52:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20021014055236.GA23044@lklug.pdn.ac.lk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 08:30:55AM -0500, Greg Copeland wrote:
>
> I'd be curious to hear in a little more detail what constitutes "not
> good" for postgres on a mosix cluster.
It seems that almost all the postgres processes remain in the `home'
node.
Please notice that I am not underestimating Mosix in any way. We have
tested many programs from our parallel processing project with extreme
success on our mosix cluster.
Anuradha
--
Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.18-xfs-1.1)
Ginger snap.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Anuradha Ratnaweera | 2002-10-14 05:55:49 | Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-14 05:48:41 | Re: droped out precise time calculations in src/interfaces/libpq/fe-connect.c |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Anuradha Ratnaweera | 2002-10-14 05:55:49 | Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-14 04:34:52 | Re: [HACKERS] ALTER TABLE ... ADD COLUMN |