Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs
Date: 2026-05-13 14:12:04
Message-ID: agSGtJrN6q27ZLgG@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 06:12:21PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 05:33:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I think we're about ready to roll on doing the pgindent run.
>>> Do you want to push your patch tomorrow AM, and then I'll get
>>> on with the rest?
>
>> Sounds good. We won't be back-patching any of this, right?
>
> Right, just HEAD.

Committed.

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2026-05-13 14:13:58 Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs
Previous Message Alena Rybakina 2026-05-13 14:04:18 Re: pull-up subquery if JOIN-ON contains refs to upper-query