Re: backup manifests

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, nospam-pg-abuse(at)bloodgate(dot)com
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: backup manifests
Date: 2019-11-24 14:38:09
Message-ID: 0ba09e15-696e-4ca7-7596-27b60004a7e5@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/23/19 4:34 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 11/23/19 3:13 AM, Tels wrote:
>>
>> Without the strong hashes it would be pointless to sign the manifest.
>>
>
> I guess I must have missed where we are planning to add a cryptographic
> signature.

I don't think we were planning to, but the user could do so if they wished.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-11-24 15:14:19 Re: Copyright information in source files
Previous Message Ranier Vilela 2019-11-24 14:23:38 [PATCH] Possible arithmetic with NULL pointer or test "stack_base_ptr != NULL" is irrelevant.