Re: backup manifests

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: nospam-pg-abuse(at)bloodgate(dot)com, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: backup manifests
Date: 2019-11-23 21:34:05
Message-ID: 11b9e0d1-2ca0-e8fb-3185-f468f2e98b29@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 11/23/19 3:13 AM, Tels wrote:
>
> Without the strong hashes it would be pointless to sign the manifest.
>
>

I guess I must have missed where we are planning to add a cryptographic
signature.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-11-24 01:01:42 LISTEN/NOTIFY testing woes
Previous Message Noah Misch 2019-11-23 21:21:36 Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?