Re: backup manifests

From: Tels <nospam-pg-abuse(at)bloodgate(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: backup manifests
Date: 2019-11-25 16:24:48
Message-ID: 845911d16a23e7b92afe8449156d3efa@bloodgate.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-11-24 15:38, David Steele wrote:
> On 11/23/19 4:34 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> On 11/23/19 3:13 AM, Tels wrote:
>>>
>>> Without the strong hashes it would be pointless to sign the manifest.
>>>
>>
>> I guess I must have missed where we are planning to add a
>> cryptographic
>> signature.
>
> I don't think we were planning to, but the user could do so if they
> wished.

That was what I meant.

Best regards,

Tels

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-11-25 17:11:53 Re: backup manifests
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2019-11-25 16:12:17 Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum