Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables

From: tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: 曾文旌(义从) <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>
Cc: Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, 蔡松露(子嘉) <zijia(at)taobao(dot)com>, "Cai, Le" <le(dot)cai(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, 萧少聪(铁庵) <shaocong(dot)xsc(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Date: 2020-03-09 14:37:45
Message-ID: 087bd809-e1d7-ee44-da1f-25996abad442@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/6/20 12:35 PM, 曾文旌(义从) wrote:
> Fixed in global_temporary_table_v17-pg13.patch

I observed that , we do support 'global temp' keyword with views

postgres=# create or replace  global temp view v1 as select 5;
CREATE VIEW

but if we take the dump( using pg_dumpall) then it only display 'create
view'

look like we are skipping it ?

--
regards,tushar
EnterpriseDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-03-09 14:55:53 Re: Remove win32ver.rc from version_stamp.pl
Previous Message tushar 2020-03-09 13:34:39 Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables