Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables

From: 曾文旌(义从) <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>
To: tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Prabhat Sahu" <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tomas Vondra" <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Konstantin Knizhnik" <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, 蔡松露(子嘉) <zijia(at)taobao(dot)com>, Cai, Le <le(dot)cai(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, 萧少聪(铁庵) <shaocong(dot)xsc(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Date: 2020-03-09 16:31:58
Message-ID: 40391A22-CB8B-4143-B936-7707667F7905@alibaba-inc.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> 2020年3月9日 下午10:37,tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> 写道:
>
> On 3/6/20 12:35 PM, 曾文旌(义从) wrote:
>> Fixed in global_temporary_table_v17-pg13.patch
>
> I observed that , we do support 'global temp' keyword with views
>
> postgres=# create or replace global temp view v1 as select 5;
> CREATE VIEW
I think we should not support global temp view.
Fixed in global_temporary_table_v18-pg13.patch.

Wenjing

>
> but if we take the dump( using pg_dumpall) then it only display 'create view'
>
> look like we are skipping it ?
>
> --
> regards,tushar
> EnterpriseDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2020-03-09 16:56:31 Re: Bug in pg_restore with EventTrigger in parallel mode
Previous Message 曾文旌 (义从) 2020-03-09 16:29:58 Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables