Re: Version Numbering

+1 for Tom's post.

--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL DBA @ Akinon/Markafoni, Red Hat Certified Engineer
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz

20.Ağu.2010 tarihinde 21:40 saatinde, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
şunları yazdı:

> "David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
>> A while ago, I asked if .0 releases could be versioned with three
>> digits instead of two. That is, it would be "8.4.0" instead of "8.4".
>
> We've been doing that for some time, no? A quick look at the CVS
> history shows that 8.0.0 and up were tagged that way.
>
>> This is to make the format consistent with maintenance releases
>> ("8.4.1", etc.). I thought this was generally agreed upon, but
>> maybe not, because I just went to build the latest 9.0 beta and saw
>> that the version number is "9.0beta4".
>
> .0 is for releases, not betas. I see no need for an extra number in
> beta versions.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers