Re: Remove obsolate comments from 047_checkpoint_physical_slot

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Remove obsolate comments from 047_checkpoint_physical_slot
Date: 2025-09-25 08:05:55
Message-ID: 019DFA0D-CD63-475D-AF8C-0F6F1652102C@yesql.se
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 25 Sep 2025, at 09:59, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:

> Yeah, let's remove that. Simplification in the backend code is the
> whole point of the double definition of the INJECTION_POINT() macro in
> injection_point.h.

And I very much approve of that, it makes the code a lot better.

> If you want to go ahead and clean up all that, Daniel, please feel
> free. If not, I'm OK to pull the trigger on this one.

No worries, I can fix it today.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amul Sul 2025-09-25 08:18:13 Re: pg_waldump: support decoding of WAL inside tarfile
Previous Message Chao Li 2025-09-25 08:01:00 Re: Fix incorrect function comment of stringToNodeInternal