RE: Remove obsolate comments from 047_checkpoint_physical_slot

From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Daniel Gustafsson' <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: RE: Remove obsolate comments from 047_checkpoint_physical_slot
Date: 2025-09-25 11:11:17
Message-ID: OSCPR01MB1496643B1368FB14D4812A074F51FA@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Daniel, Michael,

Thanks for the reply and sorry for posting many times.
Both 046_checkpoint_logical and 047_checkpoint_physical has below comments:

```
# Run another checkpoint, this time in the background, and make it wait
# on the injection point) so that the checkpoint stops right before
# removing old WAL segments.
```

Is "injection point)" a typo? I feel it is enough to remove ")".
Feel free to include if you agree this point as well.

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Artem Gavrilov 2025-09-25 11:13:24 Re: Non-blocking archiver process
Previous Message vignesh C 2025-09-25 11:08:54 Re: Skipping schema changes in publication