Re: Microsoft SQL Server Replication

From: "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: "Nate Carlson" <natecars(at)real-time(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Microsoft SQL Server Replication
Date: 2001-07-21 10:37:45
Message-ID: 005301c111d1$2ec230c0$1001a8c0@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

From: "Nate Carlson" <natecars(at)real-time(dot)com>

> We have a need to replicate a Microsoft SQL server out to a PostgreSQL
> server. Pretty much, the client uses SQL server right now, and we don't
> want to expose that to the internet in any way, so we want to set up a
> Postgres box with the same data at the colo facility. Also helps to have a
> box you can really admin remotely. :)
>
> The data will never be updated on the Postgres box, so it will be a
> one-way replication.

Not heard of anyone doing this - be interested in hearing how you make out.

MS-SQL <=> MS-SQL replication is probably going to be tricky to hack for
this situation, but you might be able to do something with Access
replicating from the MS-SQL server. Link to the Postgres server via ODBC.
Can't say I've tried it, but that would be my first attempt.

- Richard Huxton

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2001-07-21 11:10:59 Re: Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l)
Previous Message x 2001-07-21 08:08:16 COPY failure