From: | "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Nate Carlson" <natecars(at)real-time(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Microsoft SQL Server Replication |
Date: | 2001-07-21 10:37:45 |
Message-ID: | 005301c111d1$2ec230c0$1001a8c0@archonet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
From: "Nate Carlson" <natecars(at)real-time(dot)com>
> We have a need to replicate a Microsoft SQL server out to a PostgreSQL
> server. Pretty much, the client uses SQL server right now, and we don't
> want to expose that to the internet in any way, so we want to set up a
> Postgres box with the same data at the colo facility. Also helps to have a
> box you can really admin remotely. :)
>
> The data will never be updated on the Postgres box, so it will be a
> one-way replication.
Not heard of anyone doing this - be interested in hearing how you make out.
MS-SQL <=> MS-SQL replication is probably going to be tricky to hack for
this situation, but you might be able to do something with Access
replicating from the MS-SQL server. Link to the Postgres server via ODBC.
Can't say I've tried it, but that would be my first attempt.
- Richard Huxton
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-07-21 11:10:59 | Re: Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l) |
Previous Message | x | 2001-07-21 08:08:16 | COPY failure |