Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net>
Cc: Nikolas Everett <nik9000(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?
Date: 2010-04-20 18:30:14
Message-ID: z2hdcc563d11004201130u8b1a6fmeb76b65111adf1ee@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:28 PM, David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net> wrote:
>
> I'm logging via syslog, I've had trouble with that before. when i moved to syslog-ng
> on my dev environments that mostly resoved the probelm for me. but these machines
> still have vanilla syslog.

Yea, I almost always log directly via stdout on production machines
because of that.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Kerr 2010-04-20 18:32:15 Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?
Previous Message David Kerr 2010-04-20 18:28:32 Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?