Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?

From: David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nikolas Everett <nik9000(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?
Date: 2010-04-20 18:32:15
Message-ID: 20100420183215.GC53489@mr-paradox.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:30:14PM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
- On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:28 PM, David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net> wrote:
- >
- > I'm logging via syslog, I've had trouble with that before. when i moved to syslog-ng
- > on my dev environments that mostly resoved the probelm for me. but these machines
- > still have vanilla syslog.
-
- Yea, I almost always log directly via stdout on production machines
- because of that.
-

Ah well good to know i'm not the only one =)

I'll get the query info. I've got a twin system that I can use and abuse.

Dave

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roger Ging 2010-04-20 18:38:04 performance change from 8.3.1 to later releases
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2010-04-20 18:30:14 Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?