From: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing) |
Date: | 2003-10-10 19:59:06 |
Message-ID: | x7ad88q2yd.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
>>>>> "sm" == scott marlowe <scott.marlowe> writes:
>> will ungracefully kill the DB process(es). Doesn't matter what DB (or
>> any other application) you're running, you *can* lose data this way.
sm> While it is possible to lose a non-committed transaction, WAL prevents the
sm> database from becoming corrupted. Assuming proper fsyncing of your hard
sm> drives (i.e. SCSI, or IDE with write cache disabled)
So you're saying it is not possible to corrupt the WAL if the process
is ungracefully killed by the OS?
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-10 20:05:33 | Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing) |
Previous Message | Mike Leahy | 2003-10-10 19:41:06 | Unable to identify an operator '*=' for types 'character varying[]' and '"unknown"' |