Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)

From: Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
Date: 2003-10-10 19:59:06
Message-ID: x7ad88q2yd.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>>>>> "sm" == scott marlowe <scott.marlowe> writes:

>> will ungracefully kill the DB process(es). Doesn't matter what DB (or
>> any other application) you're running, you *can* lose data this way.

sm> While it is possible to lose a non-committed transaction, WAL prevents the
sm> database from becoming corrupted. Assuming proper fsyncing of your hard
sm> drives (i.e. SCSI, or IDE with write cache disabled)

So you're saying it is not possible to corrupt the WAL if the process
is ungracefully killed by the OS?

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-10 20:05:33 Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
Previous Message Mike Leahy 2003-10-10 19:41:06 Unable to identify an operator '*=' for types 'character varying[]' and '"unknown"'