Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
Date: 2003-10-10 20:05:33
Message-ID: 200310102005.h9AK5Xx08938@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Vivek Khera wrote:
> >>>>> "sm" == scott marlowe <scott.marlowe> writes:
>
> >> will ungracefully kill the DB process(es). Doesn't matter what DB (or
> >> any other application) you're running, you *can* lose data this way.
>
> sm> While it is possible to lose a non-committed transaction, WAL prevents the
> sm> database from becoming corrupted. Assuming proper fsyncing of your hard
> sm> drives (i.e. SCSI, or IDE with write cache disabled)
>
> So you're saying it is not possible to corrupt the WAL if the process
> is ungracefully killed by the OS?

Yes, it is impossible, even if the OS crashes too.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manfred Koizar 2003-10-10 20:13:25 Re: Unique Index vs. Unique Constraint
Previous Message Vivek Khera 2003-10-10 19:59:06 Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)