| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: headerscheck ccache support |
| Date: | 2025-11-21 15:57:33 |
| Message-ID: | wl6njth2qlrhyd2pacu7zpjyt2ot7ott36ewz234t6rxhfu3bd@53lkneutiavd |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2025-11-21 13:14:18 +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2025-Nov-21, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > # Verify headerscheck / cpluspluscheck succeed
> > #
> > - # - Don't use ccache, the files are uncacheable, polluting ccache's
> > - # cache
>
> So how bad is the effect of the cache pollution that's now going to
> occur? I imagine we don't really care. (I have no idea how to measure
> this, and probably it's a waste of time just to try.)
I don't think there's any cache pollution after this change - the pollution
the comment was referencing was that ccache's cache would be filled with
entries for files that would *never* be used and would therefore be
useless. With this change the added use of ccache will just accelerate the CI
runs, which I wouldn't consider polluting...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-11-21 15:57:47 | Re: Remove useless casts to (void *) |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2025-11-21 15:55:12 | Re: headerscheck ccache support |