| From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: headerscheck ccache support |
| Date: | 2025-11-22 08:37:31 |
| Message-ID: | 202511220836.lglh7yspy45l@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Nov-21, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2025-11-21 13:14:18 +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> > So how bad is the effect of the cache pollution that's now going to
> > occur?
>
> I don't think there's any cache pollution after this change - the
> pollution the comment was referencing was that ccache's cache would be
> filled with entries for files that would *never* be used and would
> therefore be useless.
Ah, that makes sense.
> With this change the added use of ccache will just accelerate the CI
> runs, which I wouldn't consider polluting...
Sure.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"If you have nothing to say, maybe you need just the right tool to help you
not say it." (New York Times, about Microsoft PowerPoint)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2025-11-22 08:37:38 | Re: [PATCH] jit: fix build with LLVM-21 |
| Previous Message | Corey Huinker | 2025-11-22 08:26:19 | Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions. |