Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1

From: <adnandursun(at)asrinbilisim(dot)com(dot)tr>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Date: 2005-05-02 11:25:26
Message-ID: web-96063001@mail3.doruk.net.tr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Sun, 01 May 2005 22:23:19 +0300
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> wrote:
>On P, 2005-05-01 at 11:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Im my case all ttransactions were implicit one command
functon calls
>("select * from dbfunc()"), so transaction timeout would
not help.
>
>probably the only way for server to detect stale
connections would be
>sending/receiving some kind of keepalives.

...and then clear stale connection. This would be nice
feature for PostgreSQL

Best Regards,

Adnan DURSUN
ASRIN Bilişim Hiz.Ltd.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvar Freude 2005-05-02 11:32:18 Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Previous Message adnandursun 2005-05-02 11:23:01 Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvar Freude 2005-05-02 11:32:18 Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Previous Message adnandursun 2005-05-02 11:23:01 Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1