From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Sofer, Yuval" <Yuval_Sofer(at)bmc(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: postgres crashes - could not reattach to shared memory |
Date: | 2010-05-02 18:31:56 |
Message-ID: | v2w937d27e11005021131x1bfe254ftc33c76a42ea12e87@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 5/2/10, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
>> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Sofer, Yuval <Yuval_Sofer(at)bmc(dot)com> wrote:
>>> PG "FATAL: could not reattach to shared memory (key=5432001,
>>> addr=02100000): Invalid argument.
>>>
>>> The version is 8.2.4, the platform is win32
>
>> This was fixed in 8.3.8 and 8.4.1. I'm not entirely sure why it didn't
>> get backpatched to 8.2 - it was mentioned in the discussion about the
>> patch, but I don't see any reason for not back patching it stated.
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/thrd5.php#00782
>
> The patch that was being worked on at the time wouldn't have come close
> to applying to 8.2, because the win32 shmem code got rearranged very
> substantially for 8.3. However, AIUI it's the same underlying
> technology, so in principle it could be fixed the same way.
Right - thats what i was expecting to see.
> If we take seriously the proposition that we're still supporting 8.2
> on Windows, we probably ought to do something about that. If we don't,
> we need to officially deprecate that version.
That's the last non-msvc++ version. Personally I'd love to drop it so
i can get rid of mingw/msys and move entirely to vc++ for Win32 and
Win64.
I'm not so sure it's fair to the users though.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gordon Shannon | 2010-05-02 18:36:58 | Re: Tracking down log segment corruption |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-02 18:10:01 | Re: Tracking down log segment corruption |