Re: PostgreSQL list traffic levels

From: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL list traffic levels
Date: 2005-06-21 14:18:30
Message-ID: thhal-0OLqTAxn/zjYjYX3Zt1DIbcNwGcybyZ@mailblocks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

It means that we have higher quality users that actually respond to
virtually every question that is asked.

Seriously, the level of support that you get from the PostgreSQL mailing
lists is exceptional compared to many others. That's a good motivation
to post.

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Does that mean we have more users, or a more difficult product? :D
>
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>
>> Did you know that the PostgreSQL General lists get slightly more
>> traffic levels/month than the MySQL lists?
>> Check out http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.mysql.general
>> http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.postgresql.general
>>
>> and the developer lists too..
>>
>> http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.mysql.devel
>> http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.general
>>
>> Best Regards, Simon Riggs
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2005-06-21 16:43:33 OSCON -- Booth Coverage
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-06-21 01:22:37 Re: PostgreSQL list traffic levels