| From: | Rene Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: JDBC patch procedures (Re: [PATCHES] Patch for jdbc2 ResultSet.java) |
| Date: | 2001-09-06 19:12:22 |
| Message-ID: | tgifpt47mdolruhnurrg6jso097rpbtjqi@4ax.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 06 Sep 2001 14:30:49 -0400, you wrote:
>Ultimately it's the committer's responsibility
>to have confidence that the patch he applies is good; if he doesn't
>feel competent to check it himself, he should call for more reviewers.
>If he does feel sure about it, there's no need for procedural overhead.
Agreed. If the committer is in the "team of certified reviewers"
and is willing to review patches, our procedures are basically
the same.
Regards,
René Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-09-06 20:07:46 | Re: JDBC patch procedures (Re: [PATCHES] Patch for jdbc2 ResultSet.java) |
| Previous Message | chris markiewicz | 2001-09-06 18:57:49 | Re: error - NOTICE: current transaction...MORE DETAIL... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-09-06 20:07:46 | Re: JDBC patch procedures (Re: [PATCHES] Patch for jdbc2 ResultSet.java) |
| Previous Message | Matt Block | 2001-09-06 18:33:24 | Re: Bug in createlang? |