Re: JDBC patch procedures (Re: [PATCHES] Patch for jdbc2 ResultSet.java)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rene Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: JDBC patch procedures (Re: [PATCHES] Patch for jdbc2 ResultSet.java)
Date: 2001-09-06 20:07:46
Message-ID: 200109062007.f86K7kJ19131@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc pgsql-patches

> On Thu, 06 Sep 2001 14:30:49 -0400, you wrote:
> >Ultimately it's the committer's responsibility
> >to have confidence that the patch he applies is good; if he doesn't
> >feel competent to check it himself, he should call for more reviewers.
> >If he does feel sure about it, there's no need for procedural overhead.
>
> Agreed. If the committer is in the "team of certified reviewers"
> and is willing to review patches, our procedures are basically
> the same.

Any committing assistance would be greatly appreciated, especially for
jdbc.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rene Pijlman 2001-09-06 20:36:55 Re: jdbc ResultSetMetaData::isWritable()
Previous Message Rene Pijlman 2001-09-06 19:12:22 Re: JDBC patch procedures (Re: [PATCHES] Patch for jdbc2 ResultSet.java)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joseph Shraibman 2001-09-06 20:44:22 Re: Patch for jdbc2 ResultSet.java
Previous Message Rene Pijlman 2001-09-06 19:12:22 Re: JDBC patch procedures (Re: [PATCHES] Patch for jdbc2 ResultSet.java)