From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Rene Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: JDBC patch procedures (Re: [PATCHES] Patch for jdbc2 ResultSet.java) |
Date: | 2001-09-06 20:07:46 |
Message-ID: | 200109062007.f86K7kJ19131@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc pgsql-patches |
> On Thu, 06 Sep 2001 14:30:49 -0400, you wrote:
> >Ultimately it's the committer's responsibility
> >to have confidence that the patch he applies is good; if he doesn't
> >feel competent to check it himself, he should call for more reviewers.
> >If he does feel sure about it, there's no need for procedural overhead.
>
> Agreed. If the committer is in the "team of certified reviewers"
> and is willing to review patches, our procedures are basically
> the same.
Any committing assistance would be greatly appreciated, especially for
jdbc.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rene Pijlman | 2001-09-06 20:36:55 | Re: jdbc ResultSetMetaData::isWritable() |
Previous Message | Rene Pijlman | 2001-09-06 19:12:22 | Re: JDBC patch procedures (Re: [PATCHES] Patch for jdbc2 ResultSet.java) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2001-09-06 20:44:22 | Re: Patch for jdbc2 ResultSet.java |
Previous Message | Rene Pijlman | 2001-09-06 19:12:22 | Re: JDBC patch procedures (Re: [PATCHES] Patch for jdbc2 ResultSet.java) |