Re: Inline non-SQL SRFs using SupportRequestSimplify

From: zengman <zengman(at)halodbtech(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inline non-SQL SRFs using SupportRequestSimplify
Date: 2025-12-20 04:23:41
Message-ID: tencent_3EF6CE184AC6A8910C540D6F@qq.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi everyone,

I've noticed this interesting feature and would like to modify this test case to clarify that we fall back to the original logic when inlining fails.
This is a small change that doesn't touch core code. What do you all think?

Regards
Man Zeng

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-misc_functions-Verify-Function-Scan-fallback-on-inli.patch application/octet-stream 3.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hironobu SUZUKI 2025-12-20 06:51:49 [PATCH] Reduce EXPLAIN ANALYZE overhead for row counting
Previous Message Xuneng Zhou 2025-12-20 03:42:29 Re: RFC: adding pytest as a supported test framework