Re: Inline non-SQL SRFs using SupportRequestSimplify

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: zengman <zengman(at)halodbtech(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inline non-SQL SRFs using SupportRequestSimplify
Date: 2025-12-20 06:57:25
Message-ID: CAFj8pRAF1FjKE=OezxxtmLm6Tc3b+zEzBCQZqLLxdgw5Op-uPw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

so 20. 12. 2025 v 5:23 odesílatel zengman <zengman(at)halodbtech(dot)com> napsal:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I've noticed this interesting feature and would like to modify this test
> case to clarify that we fall back to the original logic when inlining
> fails.
> This is a small change that doesn't touch core code. What do you all think?
>

+1

I think so message of warning should be enhanced -

"test_inline_in_from_support_func called with non-TEXT parameters" is messy
little bit.

Regards

Pavel

>
> Regards
> Man Zeng

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zsolt Parragi 2025-12-20 07:38:59 Re: Fix typo 586/686 in atomics/arch-x86.h
Previous Message Hironobu SUZUKI 2025-12-20 06:51:49 [PATCH] Reduce EXPLAIN ANALYZE overhead for row counting